When IBM’s Deep Blue defeated world chess champion Garry Kasparov in May 1997, it established that computers could outperform human experts in an activity long associated with superior intelligence. Yet Deep Blue’s achievement rested largely upon a familiar principle: calculating enormous numbers of possibilities and selecting the most promising result. Nineteen years later, Demis Hassabi’s DeepMind demonstrated something different. During its March 2016 match against Go champion Lee Sedol, AlphaGo played a move so unconventional that professional observers initially struggled to understand it. Move 37 in Game 2 raised a question that remains central to artificial intelligence: Can a machine do more than calculate? Can it develop something resembling intuition?

Subscribe now

Traditional astrology provides a useful framework for approaching this distinction through the relationship between Mercury and the Moon. Mercury signifies rational intelligence, calculation, language, and the manipulation of information. The Moon signifies perception, instinct, responsiveness, and the intuitive apprehension of circumstances. These faculties are not necessarily opposed. Indeed, certain planetary configurations may describe their integration, producing an intellectual style in which the essential structure of a problem is grasped before its constituent parts have been subjected to systematic analysis.

Three figures from my recent Aquarius Tech Bros series illustrate this possibility: Elon Musk, with Mercury/Cancer in mutual reception with Moon/Virgo, and Jeff Bezos and Dario Amodei, both with Mercury/Capricorn retrograde. Despite their different professional accomplishments, all three display an inclination to recognize broad structural relationships before undertaking the detailed work required to realize their ideas.

Mercury/Capricorn versus Mercury/Cancer

Mercury/Capricorn direct signifies disciplined, methodical reasoning. Intelligence proceeds sequentially, assembling individual observations into increasingly elaborate structures. The process resembles a PowerPoint presentation organized into bullet points: each conclusion follows from the preceding one, and progress is measured by moving systematically through the argument.

The weakness of this approach is that it may overlook relationships falling between established categories. Capricorn follows the steps but can skip the cracks.

Mercury/Cancer operates differently. Cancer is a water sign, and water fills every available opening. Rather than dissecting a problem into discrete components, Cancerian intelligence apprehends the whole, including relationships that may not be apparent through sequential analysis. The essential structure of the problem can emerge virtually simultaneously, before the individual steps required to explain it have been identified.

This is the difference between constructing a picture from its individual pieces and recognizing the picture before determining how those pieces fit together.

Under the retrograde/opposite-sign principle employed in my research, Mercury/Capricorn retrograde can acquire some of the intellectual qualities of Mercury/Cancer. Retrogradation reverses the normal direction of reasoning. Instead of proceeding from isolated facts toward a general conclusion, the individual begins with a comprehensive insight and subsequently reconstructs the analytical steps necessary to demonstrate it.

The intuitive apprehension comes first; the rational explanation follows.

This does not imply that Mercury retrograde abandons reason. Rather, reason becomes the instrument through which an initially holistic understanding is implemented.

Henri Bergson: The Moon as Intuition

The philosophical foundation for this distinction can be found in Henri Bergson (1859–1941), whose work I examined in a previous House of Wisdom article.

Bergson argued that conventional analytical intelligence cannot fully comprehend reality because it substitutes fixed observations and abstract categories for the continuous movement of existence. To understand something through analysis is to observe it from the outside, constructing a representation from a succession of separate viewpoints.

True intuition requires something different. Rather than observing an object through a series of static measurements, the observer must enter into its movement and apprehend the process from within.

Consider a melody. Its meaning cannot be recovered simply by examining each note separately. The melody exists through the continuous relationship among its notes, including their movement through time. To understand it, one must apprehend the musical whole rather than merely accumulate individual observations.

Bergson developed this distinction in An Introduction to Metaphysics (1903), contrasting analysis with intuition as fundamentally different approaches to knowledge.

His horoscope provides a corresponding astrological structure. The Moon in Cancer, in its own domicile, applies to Jupiter exalted in Cancer, which I have identified as victor of his horoscope. Lunar perception and intuition are consequently enlarged into a comprehensive philosophical system. Bergson’s concept of durée, or reality experienced as continuous movement rather than a succession of isolated moments, offers a particularly clear expression of the Moon’s intuitive nature.

Bergson is therefore an appropriate exemplar of lunar intuition operating without the necessity of reducing experience to a sequence of discrete analytical operations.

This distinction predates electronic computing. Bergson was identifying limitations of mechanical and analytical reasoning decades before computers would demonstrate just how powerful those methods could become.

From Deep Blue to AlphaGo

The development of artificial intelligence provides a practical setting in which to reconsider Bergson’s argument.

IBM’s Deep Blue defeated Kasparov in a six-game match in May 1997. The machine combined extensive chess knowledge with the capacity to evaluate approximately 200 million positions per second. Its search methods allowed it to compare enormous numbers of possible continuations and select moves according to programmed evaluation criteria.

Astrologically, this is an expression of Mercury’s rational powers: calculation, comparison, classification, and the systematic manipulation of information. Deep Blue did not need to experience the movement of the game as a human player might. Its computational capacity was sufficient to defeat the reigning world champion.

AlphaGo represented a different development.

On 10-Mar-2016, during Game 2 of its match against Lee Sedol, AlphaGo played Move 37, placing a stone in a position that professional players considered highly unconventional. DeepMind subsequently reported that its model estimated a human professional would select the move with a probability of approximately one in ten thousand.

Yet the move proved strategically valuable. AlphaGo had identified a possibility that lay outside established human expectations.

The distinction between the two systems was not simply greater computing power. AlphaGo combined tree-search methods with deep neural networks trained to recognize promising moves and evaluate the overall position. Reinforcement learning allowed the system to improve through experience, discovering strategies that did not depend entirely upon reproducing the established judgments of human experts.

The progression from Deep Blue to AlphaGo suggests that machines can develop increasingly sophisticated approximations of intuitive judgment. But can astrology identify a comparable relationship between rational and intuitive intelligence in human beings? The horoscopes of Jeff Bezos, Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk offer three examples, each illustrating a different way in which Mercury’s analytical faculties may become integrated with the Moon’s intuitive perception.

Read more

Welcome to a new research project on the Moon’s Configuration. As the fastest moving planet, the Moon makes the most frequent number of aspects between itself and other planets. Within horary astrology, understanding the Moon’s Configuration is a key step in understanding whether or not the querent’s question will come to fruition. Within natal astrology, the Moon’s Configuration is emphasized less by traditional authors, a mistake according to my teacher Robert Zoller who included an entire chapter on the Moon’s Configuration in his Diploma Course in Medieval Predictive Astrology.

I turn next to the Moon’s Configuration because of a loose end from the victor project: does the planet to which the Moon applies still a candidate for the victor even though a void-of-course or out-of-sign aspect condition occurs? Surviving natal astrology texts do not agree on this question which deserves a full treatment. In addition, the Moon’s Configuration is a key input into the second soul model based on the configuration of Moon and Mercury. This study must be completed first.

This study follows the order presented by Firmicus Maternus by starting with the Moon’s separation from Saturn; first to Jupiter, then Mars, the Sun, Venus, and Mercury in Chaldean order. I begin with the Moon’s separation from Saturn and application to Jupiter (completed) and am now (July 24, 2026) working through the Moon’s separation from Jupiter.

The report has been lightly edited (spelling) and should be considered an over-the-shoulder look at my research process. Other Moon’s separation from Jupiter’s aspects will be appended to the below file as the research progresses.

Paid subscriber link for Moon's Separation from Jupiter and application to Saturn

2025 08 06 Moons Separation From Jupiter

1.45MB ∙ PDF file

Download

Updated July 24, 2026 Separation from Jupiter and application to Saturn added Updated August 6, 2026 Separation from Jupiter and application to Venus added

Download

Moon's Separation From Saturn and Application to Jupiter, Mars, Venus, Mercury, and the Sun

6.74MB ∙ PDF file

Download

Updated July 25, 2025 Separation from Saturn and application to Mars added Updated August 14, 2025 Separation from Saturn and application to Venus added Updated October 6, 2025 Separation from Saturn and application to Mercury added Begins page 108. Separation from Saturn and application to Sun added Updated February 6, 2026 Begins page 152

Download

Data file download for paid subscribers

Click on the following link

Below the message “Can’t load this file type” click on the “Download” button

Rectified Horoscopes - Victor Proj…

Read more

Victor Of The Chart: Expanded Factor Analysis Of The Antiochus Porphyry Model

2.49MB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

Published September 21, 2011; updates October 18, 2016 and April 15, 2025.

Read time: 45 minutes

This paper presents the most extensive statistical evaluation to date of the Antiochus/Porphyry (AP) model for identifying the Victor of the Chart—the planetary ruler designed to represent the native’s soul-level purpose, life direction, or daimon. Drawing on Porphyry’s reinterpretation of Platonic and Hellenistic philosophy, the Victor is selected from among the five traditional planets (Mercury through Saturn) and aims to describe the core orientation of the individual’s incarnation, especially as it manifests through vocation and legacy.

Subscribe now

The study uses two samples of 434 horoscopes, the first rectified by the author, the second sourced from Astrodatabank. Two stages of the AP model are tested. Stage 1 identifies Victor candidates based on planetary rulerships and placements relative to key points: the Ascendant, Midheaven, Moon, Sun, Lot of Fortune, Lot of Spirit, and the prenatal syzygy. Stage 2 ranks these candidates using additional criteria, including sect, solar phase, house placement, essential dignity, receptions, and planetary configurations. The author extends Porphyry’s model with careful attention to both ancient doctrine and modern statistical rigor, employing Bayesian analysis to evaluate signal strength.

Findings confirm that bound lords (rather than sign rulers) are the most powerful and consistent predictors of the Victor, especially in Stage 1. These bound rulers corresponded well with the “empirical victor”—the planet most consistently activated during major life events via Firdaria, Zodiacal Releasing, and primary directions. While Stage 2 criteria were less consistent across the dataset, they proved valuable in resolving ambiguous cases.

The paper acknowledges subjectivity in identifying empirical victors, but argues that differences of opinion can often be resolved by distinguishing between four related models: the Victor model (soul’s purpose), the cognitive assessment model (Moon-Mercury personality), the temperament model, and the physiognomy model. These models may share planetary significators, but they describe different facets of the individual. The Victor model remains unique in its focus on the soul’s pre-incarnational choice and ethical vocation.

With over 2,500 data tables and a robust methodology, this paper is a landmark in the statistical study of traditional astrology. It not only revives Porphyry’s model with contemporary rigor but also proposes the eventual construction of a closed-form victor model—one that may help restore the astrology of the soul to a central role in natal interpretation.

Programming Credits

The author offers grateful acknowledgement to programmers João Ventura (2015-2020) and Satya (2021-2024) for implementation of Stage 1 and Stage 2 victor model testing.

Astrology Of The Soul History And Sources

840KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

Published April 25, 2012; updated March 24, 2025. Long read: 2-3 hours.

This extensive working paper surveys historical and philosophical models for identifying the soul within the natal horoscope, focusing on the traditions of Hellenistic, Medieval Arabic, and Neoplatonic astrology. The paper distinguishes between several overlapping terms—epikratētōr, oikodespotēs, kurios, psuché, and mubtazz—and explores how each was understood in its historical context. Drawing from a wide range of sources, the author highlights two dominant astrological approaches: (1) Porphyry’s kurios model, which aligns with Plato’s view of the soul as a preexistent, immortal force with a guiding daimon, and (2) Ptolemy’s more psychological model using the Moon, Mercury, and their rulers to describe moral and rational character.

Subscribe now

The paper connects astrological techniques to philosophical frameworks. Plato’s Myth of Er provides the metaphysical foundation for the soul’s pre-incarnational choice of life purpose, which Porphyry echoes through the kurios—interpreted by some astrologers as the planet associated with the soul's calling. Aristotle’s alternative tripartite model of the soul (nutritive, sensitive, rational) also finds astrological parallels, especially in Ptolemy’s assignments of soul qualities to the Moon and Mercury. The paper stresses that while direct historical influence is often difficult to prove, strong conceptual parallels justify the continued exploration of astrology’s spiritual dimensions.

A notable contribution of this paper is its rigorous treatment of the kurios model as a tool for identifying the planet most reflective of an individual’s life direction or calling—an idea rooted in Porphyry’s adaptation of Platonic thought. The author favors the kurios over the more commonly used oikodespotēs, arguing that it offers a more accurate representation of the soul’s chosen intent, particularly when essential and accidental dignities are carefully weighed.

Finally, the study includes a philosophical appendix reprinting Plato’s Myth of Er, alongside commentary on how later thinkers like Iamblichus and contemporary psychologists (e.g., James Hillman, Patrick Harpur) have reframed the daimon as a vital force behind life purpose and creative expression. The result is a compelling synthesis of classical astrology, philosophical inquiry, and spiritual psychology, aimed at restoring the “astrology of the soul” to a central place in astrological practice.

Tests Of The Ibn Ezra Victor Model

754KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

Published October 4, 2023. Read time: 30 minutes.

This paper evaluates the accuracy of Ibn Ezra’s compound scoring model for identifying the Victor of the Horoscope, a medieval astrological concept derived from the Hellenistic Kurios or Lord of the Nativity. The Victor is understood as the single most important planet in the birth chart—one that reflects the soul’s pre-incarnate choice and life purpose, often expressed in vocation or destiny. The study tests twelve different permutations of Ibn Ezra’s model across a hand-rectified sample of 330 horoscopes, including U.S. presidents, public figures from James Hillman's The Soul’s Code, spree killers, and others.

The model versions combine variations in house system (whole sign vs. Alchabitius), decan system (Chaldean vs. triplicity), and use of triplicity rulers (in-sect vs. all). The results are sobering: none of the twelve versions surpassed a 40% match rate between the model’s calculated Victor and the author’s independently chosen “empirical” Victor based on biographical and predictive techniques (e.g., Firdaria, Zodiacal Releasing, primary directions). Most models scored between 34–38%, a rate only modestly better than chance.

While some permutations slightly outperformed others—such as using in-sect triplicity rulers instead of all three, or whole sign houses over quadrant systems—the differences were small and not statistically significant. The author suggests that biases inherent in essential dignity scoring systems (e.g., unequal bound and triplicity distributions) make it difficult to assume an even 20% probability across the five planetary candidates. A future Monte Carlo simulation could better define the true random odds.

Ultimately, the paper concludes that Ibn Ezra’s scoring model, while popular among traditional astrologers for its apparent objectivity, fails to deliver the reliability expected of a predictive tool. Its poor performance casts doubt on compound Victor systems in general, and the paper echoes Benjamin Dykes’s earlier critique that lumping essential dignity with house strength in compound victor scoring models lacks theoretical justification.